EVALUATION
RESULTS
Alternative
Assessment Methods
Some days
ago the Coordinator called for a teachers meeting at school. He wanted to show
us some graphics representing the percentage of approval of each area. He presented
us first the data of this year (first and second period), where some of the
areas achieved the 90% of failure. Then, we saw similar graphics but
representing the results of the last year, which were very similar to those
shown first. With those indicators, one could conclude that at the end of this
academic year, what we know as the level of ‘mortalidad académica’ will reveal again
alarming results.
The
coordinator told us about the ‘5 Whys’, a method originally developed in
manufacturing, which ‘is an iterative question-asking technique used to explore
the cause-and-effect relationships underlying a particular problem’. Its
purpose is to reveal the root cause of a defect or problem. So, we were asked
to do the exercise of asking ourselves what would be the reasons why so many
students have had those bad results.The
majority of the teachers concluded that the main causes were the lack of family
support, the economic situation of the community, and institutional
intervention. But, what about the methodology the teachers use? Have we given
to the students alternatives when we assess them? And taking into account those
conditions, what strategies do we do to encourage the students?
Consider
this public school, which in fact is small but each teacher has 22 hours a
week, and work with 250 students on average, divided into groups of 30, 35 or
43 the biggest one. Now, think of the
population, boys and girls who live in the north part of our city, so think
about their personalities. With this panoramic, it would be easy to ‘evaluate’
them using quantitate methods once in a while to have data. Those typical
techniques that give us a number and that are less time consuming when
designing and checking them. However, maybe, using alternatives methods to ‘know’
first, and ‘assess’ then the students,
will provide better results.
If we try to know the students’ likes and dislikes, their background, abilities, and difficulties, we can decide what and how they need to learn. So, it is necessary to adopt different learning and assessment strategies like journals, conferences, portfolios, interviews, questionnaires, among others, that provide opportunities to explore and develop the students’ learning abilities. In this sense, in order to ‘assess’ instead of ‘evaluate’, we should encourage our students’ strengths through a formative process characterize by the validity of its methods.
To conclude,
I would like to highlight that we need to commit ourselves in the learning process
of our students, considering ways to prevent failure and encourage abilities to
avoid those ‘evaluation results’ and transform them into ‘assessment processess’.