miércoles, 12 de junio de 2013

I found this exercise 'a long time ago' in an interesting document.

Try to decide wether the following statements are TRUE or FALSE.

  1. An expensive test is not practical.
  2. One of the sources of unreliability of a test is the school.
  3. Students, raters, the test, and the administration of it may affect the test's reliability.
  4. In indirect tests, students do not actually perform the task.
  5. If students are aware of what is being tested when they take a test, and think that the questions are appropriate, the test has face validity.
  6. Face validity can be tested empirically.
  7. Diagnosing strengths and weaknesses of students in language learning is a facet of washback.
  8. One way of achieving authenticity in testing is to use simplified language.
 

I tried to organize the key concepts of the Principles of Language Assessment. I'm receiving suggetions to make it better.





lunes, 26 de noviembre de 2012

 

Assessing, Listening

     Listening is a commonly avoided skill in English classes. It is frequent to see vocabulary and grammar classes where students in lower grades have to find out the meaning of a list of words, and those of higher grades transcribe some grammar rules written on the board. Then, listening does not have any chance in some classes.
     As it is viewed -as the other skills- in a separated way, it is thought that it requires a lot of work due to the artifacts and the appropriate material to work on it. However, as could be seen in this chapter, there are four types of listening activities that we can gradually implement to improve this skill in our students and at the end, have multiple measures in their performances where we could assess their English competence.
     This is another important aspect we must take into account. “Multiple measures will always give you a more reliable and valid assessment than a single measure”; if we want to be objective and fair, it is necessary that learning takes place as a process.  I would like to share this case: A couple of months ago a biology and ethics’ teacher of my school, was absent for about one month because she had a motorbike accident. She evaluated the third period of a seventh grade group with only one exam. Just one girl passed their subjects; the rest of the group had grades between 1.0 and 2.0. As you could imagine, parents, students and the other teachers were very upset with her “decisions”.  At the end of the academic year, 23 students failed biology and 21 ethics; 21 failed seventh grade due in greater extent to her. How could be learning successful if we, as teachers, do not explore knowledge taking into account different factors? How can a student want to go to school if teachers do not show that students’ learning and students’ needs are important?   
     Returning to our subject, the tasks and activities we can use to improve this skill, if they are implemented in a creative way and using interesting topics and materials, could attract the students’ attention, since English classes offer the possibility to learn with innovative materials, through inspiring and subjective themes.
At school, we must create our own material, flashcards, worksheets, exams, and why not, records. Today there are a lot of programs and resources to make it possible. This is our challenge as well as to try to integrate all the skills, and to generate enough sceneries and moments where students can learn and we can triangulate their performances to asses them.
     To finish my intervention here, some teachers would say: “A mí no me pagan por hacer amigos y menos por pasar a todo el mundo”, that’s true, but our work in our country is a social commitment; we decide if we want to be conformist hated people, or change the reality offering true environments of learning.